↓ Skip to main content

People of Lower Social Status Are More Sensitive to Hedonic Product Information—Electrophysiological Evidence From an ERP Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
People of Lower Social Status Are More Sensitive to Hedonic Product Information—Electrophysiological Evidence From an ERP Study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Di Chen, Weiguo Qu, Yanhui Xiang, Jiaxu Zhao, Guyu Shen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 21 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 14%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,685,768
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,116
of 7,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,360
of 351,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#82
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.