You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interpreting Prefrontal Recruitment During Walking After Stroke: Influence of Individual Differences in Mobility and Cognitive Function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sudeshna A. Chatterjee, Emily J. Fox, Janis J. Daly, Dorian K. Rose, Samuel S. Wu, Evangelos A. Christou, Kelly A. Hawkins, Dana M. Otzel, Katie A. Butera, Jared W. Skinner, David J. Clark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,525,014
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,468
of 7,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,380
of 368,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#44
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.