↓ Skip to main content

Individual Differences in Math Ability Determine Neurocognitive Processing of Arithmetic Complexity: A Combined fNIRS-EEG Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual Differences in Math Ability Determine Neurocognitive Processing of Arithmetic Complexity: A Combined fNIRS-EEG Study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Artemenko, Mojtaba Soltanlou, Silke M. Bieck, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Thomas Dresler, Hans-Christoph Nuerk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 25 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 24%
Psychology 10 17%
Engineering 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 31 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,475,393
of 24,272,486 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,998
of 7,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,952
of 351,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#35
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,272,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.