You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hyperscanning of Interactive Juggling: Expertise Influence on Source Level Functional Connectivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00321 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David B. Stone, Gabriella Tamburro, Edson Filho, Selenia di Fronso, Claudio Robazza, Maurizio Bertollo, Silvia Comani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 22% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 19% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,206,167
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,202
of 7,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,380
of 349,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#31
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.