↓ Skip to main content

Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 7,720)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
19 X users

Readers on

mendeley
472 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Saredakis, Ancret Szpak, Brandon Birckhead, Hannah A. D. Keage, Albert Rizzo, Tobias Loetscher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 472 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 12%
Student > Master 54 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 4%
Other 66 14%
Unknown 181 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 50 11%
Psychology 49 10%
Engineering 38 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 5%
Other 88 19%
Unknown 200 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 384. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#80,788
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#44
of 7,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,813
of 397,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.