You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne N. King, Tabitha Y. Shen, M. Nicholas Musselwhite, Alyssa Huff, Mitchell D. Reed, Ivan Poliacek, Dena R. Howland, Warren Dixon, Kendall F. Morris, Donald C. Bolser, Kimberly E. Iceman, Teresa Pitts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Librarian | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#18,057,409
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,770
of 7,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,102
of 373,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#103
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.