You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Processing False Beliefs in Preschool Children and Adults: Developing a Set of Custom Tasks to Test the Theory of Mind in Neuroimaging and Behavioral Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna Wysocka, Karolina Golec, Maciej Haman, Tomasz Wolak, Bartosz Kochański, Agnieszka Pluta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Thailand | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,396,906
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,254
of 7,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,778
of 404,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#24
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.