You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neural Processing Mechanism of Mental Calculation Based on Cerebral Oscillatory Changes: A Comparison Between Abacus Experts and Novices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00137 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdelkader Nasreddine Belkacem, Kanako Kiso, Etsuko Uokawa, Tetsu Goto, Shiro Yorifuji, Masayuki Hirata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 26% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,336,154
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,344
of 7,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,942
of 403,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#51
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.