You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Negative Bias During Early Attentional Engagement in Major Depressive Disorder as Examined Using a Two-Stage Model: High Sensitivity to Sad but Bluntness to Happy Cues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2020.593010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiang Ao, Licheng Mo, Zhaoguo Wei, Wenwen Yu, Fang Zhou, Dandan Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,114,646
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,539
of 7,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,971
of 503,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#25
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.