You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatry: Is There a Need for Electric Field Standardization?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2021.639640 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zsolt Turi, Claus Normann, Katharina Domschke, Andreas Vlachos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 36% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 19% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,311,777
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,216
of 7,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,222
of 452,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#39
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.