↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Revisiting the L-dopa response as a predictor of motor outcomes after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Revisiting the L-dopa response as a predictor of motor outcomes after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1349628
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhengyu Lin, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Linbin Wang, Yingying Zhang, Haiyan Zhou, Qingfang Sun, Bomin Sun, Peng Huang, Dianyou Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,070,846
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,544
of 7,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,731
of 231,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.