You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proceedings of the 11th Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: pushing the forefront of neuromodulation with functional network mapping, biomarkers for adaptive DBS, bioethical dilemmas, AI-guided neuromodulation, and translational advancements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1320806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kara A. Johnson, Nico U. F. Dosenbach, Evan M. Gordon, Cristin G. Welle, Kevin B. Wilkins, Helen M. Bronte-Stewart, Valerie Voon, Takashi Morishita, Yuki Sakai, Amanda R. Merner, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Theresa Williamson, Andreas Horn, Ro'ee Gilron, Jonathan O'Keeffe, Aryn H. Gittis, Wolf-Julian Neumann, Simon Little, Nicole R. Provenza, Sameer A. Sheth, Alfonso Fasano, Abbey B. Holt-Becker, Robert S. Raike, Lisa Moore, Yagna J. Pathak, David Greene, Sara Marceglia, Lothar Krinke, Huiling Tan, Hagai Bergman, Monika Pötter-Nerger, Bomin Sun, Laura Y. Cabrera, Cameron C. McIntyre, Noam Harel, Helen S. Mayberg, Andrew D. Krystal, Nader Pouratian, Philip A. Starr, Kelly D. Foote, Michael S. Okun, Joshua K. Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 50% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Guinea | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
| Scientists | 7 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,280,371
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,036
of 7,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,777
of 337,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.