↓ Skip to main content

The Retrosplenial Cortex: Intrinsic Connectivity and Connections with the (Para)Hippocampal Region in the Rat. An Interactive Connectome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Retrosplenial Cortex: Intrinsic Connectivity and Connections with the (Para)Hippocampal Region in the Rat. An Interactive Connectome
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2011.00007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jørgen Sugar, Menno P. Witter, Niels M. van Strien, Natalie L. M. Cappaert

Abstract

A connectome is an indispensable tool for brain researchers, since it quickly provides comprehensive knowledge of the brain's anatomical connections. Such knowledge lies at the basis of understanding network functions. Our first comprehensive and interactive account of brain connections comprised the rat hippocampal-parahippocampal network. We have now added all anatomical connections with the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) as well as the intrinsic connections of this region, because of the interesting functional overlap between these brain regions. The RSC is involved in a variety of cognitive tasks including memory, navigation, and prospective thinking, yet the exact role of the RSC and the functional differences between its subdivisions remain elusive. The connectome presented here may help to define this role by providing an unprecedented interactive and searchable overview of all connections within and between the rat RSC, parahippocampal region and hippocampal formation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 400 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 23%
Researcher 74 18%
Student > Master 46 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 70 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 138 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 7%
Psychology 26 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 81 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,911,493
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#338
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,710
of 180,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.