↓ Skip to main content

Automated Probabilistic Reconstruction of White-Matter Pathways in Health and Disease Using an Atlas of the Underlying Anatomy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
517 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
506 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated Probabilistic Reconstruction of White-Matter Pathways in Health and Disease Using an Atlas of the Underlying Anatomy
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2011.00023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anastasia Yendiki, Patricia Panneck, Priti Srinivasan, Allison Stevens, Lilla Zöllei, Jean Augustinack, Ruopeng Wang, David Salat, Stefan Ehrlich, Tim Behrens, Saad Jbabdi, Randy Gollub, Bruce Fischl

Abstract

We have developed a method for automated probabilistic reconstruction of a set of major white-matter pathways from diffusion-weighted MR images. Our method is called TRACULA (TRActs Constrained by UnderLying Anatomy) and utilizes prior information on the anatomy of the pathways from a set of training subjects. By incorporating this prior knowledge in the reconstruction procedure, our method obviates the need for manual interaction with the tract solutions at a later stage and thus facilitates the application of tractography to large studies. In this paper we illustrate the application of the method on data from a schizophrenia study and investigate whether the inclusion of both patients and healthy subjects in the training set affects our ability to reconstruct the pathways reliably. We show that, since our method does not constrain the exact spatial location or shape of the pathways but only their trajectory relative to the surrounding anatomical structures, a set a of healthy training subjects can be used to reconstruct the pathways accurately in patients as well as in controls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
United Kingdom 10 2%
Canada 6 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 461 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 23%
Student > Master 49 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 31 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 85 17%
Unknown 80 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 92 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 16%
Psychology 55 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 8%
Engineering 36 7%
Other 70 14%
Unknown 130 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,247,941
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#312
of 742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,664
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.