↓ Skip to main content

Tools for Brain-Computer Interaction: A General Concept for a Hybrid BCI

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tools for Brain-Computer Interaction: A General Concept for a Hybrid BCI
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2011.00030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gernot R. Müller-Putz, Christian Breitwieser, Febo Cincotti, Robert Leeb, Martijn Schreuder, Francesco Leotta, Michele Tavella, Luigi Bianchi, Alex Kreilinger, Andrew Ramsay, Martin Rohm, Max Sagebaum, Luca Tonin, Christa Neuper, José del. R. Millán

Abstract

The aim of this work is to present the development of a hybrid Brain-Computer Interface (hBCI) which combines existing input devices with a BCI. Thereby, the BCI should be available if the user wishes to extend the types of inputs available to an assistive technology system, but the user can also choose not to use the BCI at all; the BCI is active in the background. The hBCI might decide on the one hand which input channel(s) offer the most reliable signal(s) and switch between input channels to improve information transfer rate, usability, or other factors, or on the other hand fuse various input channels. One major goal therefore is to bring the BCI technology to a level where it can be used in a maximum number of scenarios in a simple way. To achieve this, it is of great importance that the hBCI is able to operate reliably for long periods, recognizing and adapting to changes as it does so. This goal is only possible if many different subsystems in the hBCI can work together. Since one research institute alone cannot provide such different functionality, collaboration between institutes is necessary. To allow for such a collaboration, a new concept and common software framework is introduced. It consists of four interfaces connecting the classical BCI modules: signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and the application. But it provides also the concept of fusion and shared control. In a proof of concept, the functionality of the proposed system was demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Italy 3 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 183 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 24%
Student > Master 36 18%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 75 38%
Computer Science 38 19%
Neuroscience 19 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 35 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,310,549
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#623
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,950
of 180,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.