↓ Skip to main content

COINS: An Innovative Informatics and Neuroimaging Tool Suite Built for Large Heterogeneous Datasets

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COINS: An Innovative Informatics and Neuroimaging Tool Suite Built for Large Heterogeneous Datasets
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2011.00033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Scott, Will Courtney, Dylan Wood, Raul de la Garza, Susan Lane, Margaret King, Runtang Wang, Jody Roberts, Jessica A. Turner, Vince D. Calhoun

Abstract

The availability of well-characterized neuroimaging data with large numbers of subjects, especially for clinical populations, is critical to advancing our understanding of the healthy and diseased brain. Such data enables questions to be answered in a much more generalizable manner and also has the potential to yield solutions derived from novel methods that were conceived after the original studies' implementation. Though there is currently growing interest in data sharing, the neuroimaging community has been struggling for years with how to best encourage sharing data across brain imaging studies. With the advent of studies that are much more consistent across sites (e.g., resting functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and structural imaging) the potential of pooling data across studies continues to gain momentum. At the mind research network, we have developed the collaborative informatics and neuroimaging suite (COINS; http://coins.mrn.org) to provide researchers with an information system based on an open-source model that includes web-based tools to manage studies, subjects, imaging, clinical data, and other assessments. The system currently hosts data from nine institutions, over 300 studies, over 14,000 subjects, and over 19,000 MRI, MEG, and EEG scan sessions in addition to more than 180,000 clinical assessments. In this paper we provide a description of COINS with comparison to a valuable and popular system known as XNAT. Although there are many similarities between COINS and other electronic data management systems, the differences that may concern researchers in the context of multi-site, multi-organizational data sharing environments with intuitive ease of use and PHI security are emphasized as important attributes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 113 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 11%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 21 16%
Computer Science 20 15%
Engineering 19 15%
Psychology 16 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,595,123
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#492
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,107
of 183,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.