You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LORIS: a web-based data management system for multi-center studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fninf.2011.00037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samir Das, Alex P. Zijdenbos, Jonathan Harlap, Dario Vins, Alan C. Evans |
| Abstract |
Longitudinal Online Research and Imaging System (LORIS) is a modular and extensible web-based data management system that integrates all aspects of a multi-center study: from heterogeneous data acquisition (imaging, clinical, behavior, and genetics) to storage, processing, and ultimately dissemination. It provides a secure, user-friendly, and streamlined platform to automate the flow of clinical trials and complex multi-center studies. A subject-centric internal organization allows researchers to capture and subsequently extract all information, longitudinal or cross-sectional, from any subset of the study cohort. Extensive error-checking and quality control procedures, security, data management, data querying, and administrative functions provide LORIS with a triple capability (1) continuous project coordination and monitoring of data acquisition (2) data storage/cleaning/querying, (3) interface with arbitrary external data processing "pipelines." LORIS is a complete solution that has been thoroughly tested through a full 10 year life cycle of a multi-center longitudinal project and is now supporting numerous international neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration research projects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 30 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 13% |
| Engineering | 17 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,539,941
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#430
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,214
of 247,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.