You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The INIA19 Template and NeuroMaps Atlas for Primate Brain Image Parcellation and Spatial Normalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fninf.2012.00027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Torsten Rohlfing, Christopher D. Kroenke, Edith V. Sullivan, Mark F. Dubach, Douglas M. Bowden, Kathleen A. Grant, Adolf Pfefferbaum |
| Abstract |
The INIA19 is a new, high-quality template for imaging-based studies of non-human primate brains, created from high-resolution, T(1)-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images of 19 rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) animals. Combined with the comprehensive cortical and sub-cortical label map of the NeuroMaps atlas, the INIA19 is equally suitable for studies requiring both spatial normalization and atlas label propagation. Population-averaged template images are provided for both the brain and the whole head, to allow alignment of the atlas with both skull-stripped and unstripped data, and thus to facilitate its use for skull stripping of new images. This article describes the construction of the template using freely available software tools, as well as the template itself, which is being made available to the scientific community (http://nitrc.org/projects/inia19/). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 28% |
| Researcher | 36 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 43 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 15 | 11% |
| Engineering | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#17,673,866
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#593
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,356
of 244,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.