↓ Skip to main content

Mutual information spectrum for selection of event-related spatial components. Application to eloquent motor cortex mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutual information spectrum for selection of event-related spatial components. Application to eloquent motor cortex mapping
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2013.00053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexei Ossadtchi, Platon Pronko, Sylvain Baillet, Mark E. Pflieger, Tatiana Stroganova

Abstract

Spatial component analysis is often used to explore multidimensional time series data whose sources cannot be measured directly. Several methods may be used to decompose the data into a set of spatial components with temporal loadings. Component selection is of crucial importance, and should be supported by objective criteria. In some applications, the use of a well defined component selection criterion may provide for automation of the analysis. In this paper we describe a novel approach for ranking of spatial components calculated from the EEG or MEG data recorded within evoked response paradigm. Our method is called Mutual Information (MI) Spectrum and is based on gauging the amount of MI of spatial component temporal loadings with a synthetically created reference signal. We also describe the appropriate randomization based statistical assessment scheme that can be used for selection of components with statistically significant amount of MI. Using simulated data with realistic trial to trial variations and SNR corresponding to the real recordings we demonstrate the superior performance characteristics of the described MI based measure as compared to a more conventionally used power driven gauge. We also demonstrate the application of the MI Spectrum for the selection of task-related independent components from real MEG data. We show that the MI spectrum allows to identify task-related components reliably in a consistent fashion, yielding stable results even from a small number of trials. We conclude that the proposed method fits naturally the information driven nature of ICA and can be used for routine and automatic ranking of independent components calculated from the functional neuroimaging data collected within event-related paradigms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 26%
Engineering 5 19%
Computer Science 3 11%
Psychology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,216,580
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#675
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,751
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.