↓ Skip to main content

Equation-oriented specification of neural models for simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Equation-oriented specification of neural models for simulations
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2014.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Stimberg, Dan F. M. Goodman, Victor Benichoux, Romain Brette

Abstract

Simulating biological neuronal networks is a core method of research in computational neuroscience. A full specification of such a network model includes a description of the dynamics and state changes of neurons and synapses, as well as the synaptic connectivity patterns and the initial values of all parameters. A standard approach in neuronal modeling software is to build network models based on a library of pre-defined components and mechanisms; if a model component does not yet exist, it has to be defined in a special-purpose or general low-level language and potentially be compiled and linked with the simulator. Here we propose an alternative approach that allows flexible definition of models by writing textual descriptions based on mathematical notation. We demonstrate that this approach allows the definition of a wide range of models with minimal syntax. Furthermore, such explicit model descriptions allow the generation of executable code for various target languages and devices, since the description is not tied to an implementation. Finally, this approach also has advantages for readability and reproducibility, because the model description is fully explicit, and because it can be automatically parsed and transformed into formatted descriptions. The presented approach has been implemented in the Brian2 simulator.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 139 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 31%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 29 19%
Engineering 29 19%
Computer Science 27 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 17%
Physics and Astronomy 8 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,189,417
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#482
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,619
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.