↓ Skip to main content

Neo: an object model for handling electrophysiology data in multiple formats

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neo: an object model for handling electrophysiology data in multiple formats
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2014.00010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Garcia, Domenico Guarino, Florent Jaillet, Todd Jennings, Robert Pröpper, Philipp L. Rautenberg, Chris C. Rodgers, Andrey Sobolev, Thomas Wachtler, Pierre Yger, Andrew P. Davison

Abstract

Neuroscientists use many different software tools to acquire, analyze and visualize electrophysiological signals. However, incompatible data models and file formats make it difficult to exchange data between these tools. This reduces scientific productivity, renders potentially useful analysis methods inaccessible and impedes collaboration between labs. A common representation of the core data would improve interoperability and facilitate data-sharing. To that end, we propose here a language-independent object model, named "Neo," suitable for representing data acquired from electroencephalographic, intracellular, or extracellular recordings, or generated from simulations. As a concrete instantiation of this object model we have developed an open source implementation in the Python programming language. In addition to representing electrophysiology data in memory for the purposes of analysis and visualization, the Python implementation provides a set of input/output (IO) modules for reading/writing the data from/to a variety of commonly used file formats. Support is included for formats produced by most of the major manufacturers of electrophysiology recording equipment and also for more generic formats such as MATLAB. Data representation and data analysis are conceptually separate: it is easier to write robust analysis code if it is focused on analysis and relies on an underlying package to handle data representation. For that reason, and also to be as lightweight as possible, the Neo object model and the associated Python package are deliberately limited to representation of data, with no functions for data analysis or visualization. Software for neurophysiology data analysis and visualization built on top of Neo automatically gains the benefits of interoperability, easier data sharing and automatic format conversion; there is already a burgeoning ecosystem of such tools. We intend that Neo should become the standard basis for Python tools in neurophysiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 7 4%
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 139 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 38%
Researcher 37 24%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 46 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 26%
Computer Science 13 8%
Engineering 10 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,795,989
of 25,104,329 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#105
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,781
of 318,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,104,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.