↓ Skip to main content

Stimfit: quantifying electrophysiological data with Python

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stimfit: quantifying electrophysiological data with Python
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2014.00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Segundo J. Guzman, Alois Schlögl, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber

Abstract

Intracellular electrophysiological recordings provide crucial insights into elementary neuronal signals such as action potentials and synaptic currents. Analyzing and interpreting these signals is essential for a quantitative understanding of neuronal information processing, and requires both fast data visualization and ready access to complex analysis routines. To achieve this goal, we have developed Stimfit, a free software package for cellular neurophysiology with a Python scripting interface and a built-in Python shell. The program supports most standard file formats for cellular neurophysiology and other biomedical signals through the Biosig library. To quantify and interpret the activity of single neurons and communication between neurons, the program includes algorithms to characterize the kinetics of presynaptic action potentials and postsynaptic currents, estimate latencies between pre- and postsynaptic events, and detect spontaneously occurring events. We validate and benchmark these algorithms, give estimation errors, and provide sample use cases, showing that Stimfit represents an efficient, accessible and extensible way to accurately analyze and interpret neuronal signals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 26%
Researcher 45 24%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 77 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Engineering 9 5%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 20 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,109,141
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#150
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,294
of 314,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.