↓ Skip to main content

A review of multivariate analyses in imaging genetics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of multivariate analyses in imaging genetics
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2014.00029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingyu Liu, Vince D. Calhoun

Abstract

Recent advances in neuroimaging technology and molecular genetics provide the unique opportunity to investigate genetic influence on the variation of brain attributes. Since the year 2000, when the initial publication on brain imaging and genetics was released, imaging genetics has been a rapidly growing research approach with increasing publications every year. Several reviews have been offered to the research community focusing on various study designs. In addition to study design, analytic tools and their proper implementation are also critical to the success of a study. In this review, we survey recent publications using data from neuroimaging and genetics, focusing on methods capturing multivariate effects accommodating the large number of variables from both imaging data and genetic data. We group the analyses of genetic or genomic data into either a priori driven or data driven approach, including gene-set enrichment analysis, multifactor dimensionality reduction, principal component analysis, independent component analysis (ICA), and clustering. For the analyses of imaging data, ICA and extensions of ICA are the most widely used multivariate methods. Given detailed reviews of multivariate analyses of imaging data available elsewhere, we provide a brief summary here that includes a recently proposed method known as independent vector analysis. Finally, we review methods focused on bridging the imaging and genetic data by establishing multivariate and multiple genotype-phenotype-associations, including sparse partial least squares, sparse canonical correlation analysis, sparse reduced rank regression and parallel ICA. These methods are designed to extract latent variables from both genetic and imaging data, which become new genotypes and phenotypes, and the links between the new genotype-phenotype pairs are maximized using different cost functions. The relationship between these methods along with their assumptions, advantages, and limitations are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 194 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Neuroscience 29 14%
Engineering 21 10%
Psychology 19 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 48 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#622
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,546
of 224,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.