↓ Skip to main content

Machine learning patterns for neuroimaging-genetic studies in the cloud

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Machine learning patterns for neuroimaging-genetic studies in the cloud
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2014.00031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benoit Da Mota, Radu Tudoran, Alexandru Costan, Gaël Varoquaux, Goetz Brasche, Patricia Conrod, Herve Lemaitre, Tomas Paus, Marcella Rietschel, Vincent Frouin, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Gabriel Antoniu, Bertrand Thirion

Abstract

Brain imaging is a natural intermediate phenotype to understand the link between genetic information and behavior or brain pathologies risk factors. Massive efforts have been made in the last few years to acquire high-dimensional neuroimaging and genetic data on large cohorts of subjects. The statistical analysis of such data is carried out with increasingly sophisticated techniques and represents a great computational challenge. Fortunately, increasing computational power in distributed architectures can be harnessed, if new neuroinformatics infrastructures are designed and training to use these new tools is provided. Combining a MapReduce framework (TomusBLOB) with machine learning algorithms (Scikit-learn library), we design a scalable analysis tool that can deal with non-parametric statistics on high-dimensional data. End-users describe the statistical procedure to perform and can then test the model on their own computers before running the very same code in the cloud at a larger scale. We illustrate the potential of our approach on real data with an experiment showing how the functional signal in subcortical brain regions can be significantly fit with genome-wide genotypes. This experiment demonstrates the scalability and the reliability of our framework in the cloud with a 2 weeks deployment on hundreds of virtual machines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Malaysia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 51 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Engineering 5 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,740,286
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#592
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,956
of 228,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.