↓ Skip to main content

Multi-scale integration and predictability in resting state brain activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-scale integration and predictability in resting state brain activity
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2014.00066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artemy Kolchinsky, Martijn P. van den Heuvel, Alessandra Griffa, Patric Hagmann, Luis M. Rocha, Olaf Sporns, Joaquín Goñi

Abstract

The human brain displays heterogeneous organization in both structure and function. Here we develop a method to characterize brain regions and networks in terms of information-theoretic measures. We look at how these measures scale when larger spatial regions as well as larger connectome sub-networks are considered. This framework is applied to human brain fMRI recordings of resting-state activity and DSI-inferred structural connectivity. We find that strong functional coupling across large spatial distances distinguishes functional hubs from unimodal low-level areas, and that this long-range functional coupling correlates with structural long-range efficiency on the connectome. We also find a set of connectome regions that are both internally integrated and coupled to the rest of the brain, and which resemble previously reported resting-state networks. Finally, we argue that information-theoretic measures are useful for characterizing the functional organization of the brain at multiple scales.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
France 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 84 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 34%
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 21 21%
Psychology 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Computer Science 11 11%
Engineering 10 10%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,239,304
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#145
of 825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,841
of 235,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.