↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Harnessing modern web application technology to create intuitive and efficient data visualization and sharing tools

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Harnessing modern web application technology to create intuitive and efficient data visualization and sharing tools
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2015.00014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dylan Wood

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 71 in vol. 8, PMID: 25206330.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,274,720
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#679
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,994
of 266,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.