↓ Skip to main content

A unified framework for spiking and gap-junction interactions in distributed neuronal network simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A unified framework for spiking and gap-junction interactions in distributed neuronal network simulations
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2015.00022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Hahne, Moritz Helias, Susanne Kunkel, Jun Igarashi, Matthias Bolten, Andreas Frommer, Markus Diesmann

Abstract

Contemporary simulators for networks of point and few-compartment model neurons come with a plethora of ready-to-use neuron and synapse models and support complex network topologies. Recent technological advancements have broadened the spectrum of application further to the efficient simulation of brain-scale networks on supercomputers. In distributed network simulations the amount of spike data that accrues per millisecond and process is typically low, such that a common optimization strategy is to communicate spikes at relatively long intervals, where the upper limit is given by the shortest synaptic transmission delay in the network. This approach is well-suited for simulations that employ only chemical synapses but it has so far impeded the incorporation of gap-junction models, which require instantaneous neuronal interactions. Here, we present a numerical algorithm based on a waveform-relaxation technique which allows for network simulations with gap junctions in a way that is compatible with the delayed communication strategy. Using a reference implementation in the NEST simulator, we demonstrate that the algorithm and the required data structures can be smoothly integrated with existing code such that they complement the infrastructure for spiking connections. To show that the unified framework for gap-junction and spiking interactions achieves high performance and delivers high accuracy in the presence of gap junctions, we present benchmarks for workstations, clusters, and supercomputers. Finally, we discuss limitations of the novel technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Computer Science 6 11%
Engineering 6 11%
Physics and Astronomy 6 11%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,291,381
of 23,513,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#534
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,526
of 268,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,513,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.