↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 848)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
84 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2017.00076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans E. Plesser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 379 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 20%
Student > Master 52 14%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Professor 20 5%
Other 77 20%
Unknown 76 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 45 12%
Engineering 32 8%
Psychology 30 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 6%
Other 120 32%
Unknown 104 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#418,206
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#8
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,658
of 453,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.