↓ Skip to main content

A Statistically Representative Atlas for Mapping Neuronal Circuits in the Drosophila Adult Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Statistically Representative Atlas for Mapping Neuronal Circuits in the Drosophila Adult Brain
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2018.00013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio Arganda-Carreras, Tudor Manoliu, Nicolas Mazuras, Florian Schulze, Juan E. Iglesias, Katja Bühler, Arnim Jenett, François Rouyer, Philippe Andrey

Abstract

Imaging the expression patterns of reporter constructs is a powerful tool to dissect the neuronal circuits of perception and behavior in the adult brain ofDrosophila, one of the major models for studying brain functions. To date, severalDrosophilabrain templates and digital atlases have been built to automatically analyze and compare collections of expression pattern images. However, there has been no systematic comparison of performances between alternative atlasing strategies and registration algorithms. Here, we objectively evaluated the performance of different strategies for building adultDrosophilabrain templates and atlases. In addition, we used state-of-the-art registration algorithms to generate a new group-wise inter-sex atlas. Our results highlight the benefit of statistical atlases over individual ones and show that the newly proposed inter-sex atlas outperformed existing solutions for automated registration and annotation of expression patterns. Over 3,000 images from the Janelia Farm FlyLight collection were registered using the proposed strategy. These registered expression patterns can be searched and compared with a new version of the BrainBaseWeb system and BrainGazer software. We illustrate the validity of our methodology and brain atlas with registration-based predictions of expression patterns in a subset of clock neurons. The described registration framework should benefit to brain studies inDrosophilaand other insect species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Computer Science 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,431,072
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#475
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,305
of 332,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.