Title |
A Statistically Representative Atlas for Mapping Neuronal Circuits in the Drosophila Adult Brain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fninf.2018.00013 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ignacio Arganda-Carreras, Tudor Manoliu, Nicolas Mazuras, Florian Schulze, Juan E. Iglesias, Katja Bühler, Arnim Jenett, François Rouyer, Philippe Andrey |
Abstract |
Imaging the expression patterns of reporter constructs is a powerful tool to dissect the neuronal circuits of perception and behavior in the adult brain ofDrosophila, one of the major models for studying brain functions. To date, severalDrosophilabrain templates and digital atlases have been built to automatically analyze and compare collections of expression pattern images. However, there has been no systematic comparison of performances between alternative atlasing strategies and registration algorithms. Here, we objectively evaluated the performance of different strategies for building adultDrosophilabrain templates and atlases. In addition, we used state-of-the-art registration algorithms to generate a new group-wise inter-sex atlas. Our results highlight the benefit of statistical atlases over individual ones and show that the newly proposed inter-sex atlas outperformed existing solutions for automated registration and annotation of expression patterns. Over 3,000 images from the Janelia Farm FlyLight collection were registered using the proposed strategy. These registered expression patterns can be searched and compared with a new version of the BrainBaseWeb system and BrainGazer software. We illustrate the validity of our methodology and brain atlas with registration-based predictions of expression patterns in a subset of clock neurons. The described registration framework should benefit to brain studies inDrosophilaand other insect species. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 13 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 14 | 32% |