↓ Skip to main content

Everything Matters: The ReproNim Perspective on Reproducible Neuroimaging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Everything Matters: The ReproNim Perspective on Reproducible Neuroimaging
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fninf.2019.00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

David N. Kennedy, Sanu A. Abraham, Julianna F. Bates, Albert Crowley, Satrajit Ghosh, Tom Gillespie, Mathias Goncalves, Jeffrey S. Grethe, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Michael Hanke, Christian Haselgrove, Steven M. Hodge, Dorota Jarecka, Jakub Kaczmarzyk, David B. Keator, Kyle Meyer, Maryann E. Martone, Smruti Padhy, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Nina Preuss, Troy Sincomb, Matt Travers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 31%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 23%
Psychology 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,939,175
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#235
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,136
of 449,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.