↓ Skip to main content

Embedding Reward Signals into Perception and Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Embedding Reward Signals into Perception and Cognition
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2010.00017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiz Pessoa, Jan B. Engelmann

Abstract

Despite considerable interest in the neural basis of valuation, the question of how valuation affects cognitive processing has received relatively less attention. Here, we review evidence from recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies supporting the notion that motivation can enhance perceptual and executive control processes to achieve more efficient goal-directed behavior. Specifically, in the context of cognitive tasks offering monetary gains, improved behavioral performance has been repeatedly observed in conjunction with elevated neural activations in task-relevant perceptual, cognitive and reward-related regions. We address the neural basis of motivation-cognition interactions by suggesting various modes of communication between relevant neural networks: (1) global hub regions may integrate information from multiple inputs providing a communicative link between specialized networks; (2) point-to-point interactions allow for more specific cross-network communication; and (3) diffuse neuromodulatory systems can relay motivational signals to cortex and enhance signal processing. Together, these modes of communication allow information regarding motivational significance to reach relevant brain regions and shape behavior.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 372 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 25%
Researcher 79 20%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Professor 28 7%
Other 76 19%
Unknown 44 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 190 47%
Neuroscience 43 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 4%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 41 10%
Unknown 58 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,067
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,768
of 103,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.