↓ Skip to main content

Binding by Asynchrony: The Neuronal Phase Code

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Binding by Asynchrony: The Neuronal Phase Code
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2010.00051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoltan Nadasdy

Abstract

Neurons display continuous subthreshold oscillations and discrete action potentials (APs). When APs are phase-locked to the subthreshold oscillation, we hypothesize they represent two types of information: the presence/absence of a sensory feature and the phase of subthreshold oscillation. If subthreshold oscillation phases are neuron-specific, then the sources of APs can be recovered based on the AP times. If the spatial information about the stimulus is converted to AP phases, then APs from multiple neurons can be combined into a single axon and the spatial configuration reconstructed elsewhere. For the reconstruction to be successful, we introduce two assumptions: that a subthreshold oscillation field has a constant phase gradient and that coincidences between APs and intracellular subthreshold oscillations are neuron-specific as defined by the "interference principle." Under these assumptions, a phase-coding model enables information transfer between structures and reproduces experimental phenomenons such as phase precession, grid cell architecture, and phase modulation of cortical spikes. This article reviews a recently proposed neuronal algorithm for information encoding and decoding from the phase of APs (Nadasdy, 2009). The focus is given to the principles common across different systems instead of emphasizing system specific differences.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 5%
Germany 9 4%
Canada 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Switzerland 3 1%
France 3 1%
Portugal 3 1%
China 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 193 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 29%
Researcher 60 25%
Student > Master 29 12%
Professor 18 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 22 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 34%
Psychology 32 13%
Neuroscience 27 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Computer Science 11 5%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 33 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,400
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,305
of 103,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.