You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interoception Drives Increased Rational Decision-Making in Meditators Playing the Ultimatum Game
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2011.00049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrich Kirk, Jonathan Downar, P. Read Montague |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| Australia | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 438 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 100 | 21% |
| Researcher | 83 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 100 | 21% |
| Unknown | 45 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 211 | 45% |
| Neuroscience | 43 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 68 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2020.
All research outputs
#260,800
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#112
of 11,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,015
of 190,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.