↓ Skip to main content

Reading with a Simulated 60-Channel Implant

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reading with a Simulated 60-Channel Implant
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2011.00057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angélica Pérez Fornos, Jörg Sommerhalder, Marco Pelizzone

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 26%
Computer Science 7 14%
Psychology 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 3 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,897
of 10,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,800
of 181,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#32
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.