↓ Skip to main content

Combining Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy with Serial Section Reconstruction in the Study of Adult Neurogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy with Serial Section Reconstruction in the Study of Adult Neurogenesis
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2011.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Luzzati, Aldo Fasolo, Paolo Peretto

Abstract

Current advances in imaging techniques have extended the possibility of visualizing small structures within large volumes of both fixed and live specimens without sectioning. These techniques have contributed valuable information to study neuronal plasticity in the adult brain. However, technical limits still hamper the use of these approaches to investigate neurogenic regions located far from the ventricular surface such as parenchymal neurogenic niches, or the scattered neuroblasts induced by brain lesions. Here, we present a method to combine confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and serial section reconstruction in order to reconstruct large volumes of brain tissue at cellular resolution. In this method a series of thick sections are imaged with CLSM and the resulting stacks of images are registered and 3D reconstructed. This approach is based on existing freeware software and can be performed on ordinary laboratory personal computers. By using this technique we have investigated the morphology and spatial organization of a group of doublecortin (DCX)+ neuroblasts located in the lateral striatum of the late post-natal guinea pig. The 3D study unraveled a complex network of long and poorly ramified cell processes, often fascicled and mostly oriented along the internal capsule fiber bundles. These data support CLSM serial section reconstruction as a reliable alternative to the whole mount approaches to analyze cyto-architectural features of adult germinative niches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 56 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 45%
Neuroscience 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,067
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,802
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#52
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.