↓ Skip to main content

The Smell of Blue Light: A New Approach toward Understanding an Olfactory Neuronal Network

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Smell of Blue Light: A New Approach toward Understanding an Olfactory Neuronal Network
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2011.00072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klemens F. Störtkuhl, André Fiala

Abstract

Olfaction is one of the most important senses throughout the animal kingdom. It enables animals to discriminate between a wide variety of attractive and repulsive odorants and often plays a decisive role in species specific communication. In recent years the analysis of olfactory systems both invertebrates and invertebrates has attracted much scientific interest. In this context a pivotal question is how the properties and connectivities of individual neurons contribute to a functioning neuronal network that mediates odor-guided behavior. As a novel approach to analyze the role of individual neurons within a circuitry, techniques have been established that make use of light-sensitive proteins. In this review we introduce a non-invasive, optogenetic technique which was used to manipulate the activity of individual neurons in the olfactory system of Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Both channelrhodopsin-2 and the photosensitive adenylyl cyclase PAC α in individual olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) of the olfactory system of Drosophila larvae allows stimulating individual receptor neurons by light. Depending on which particular ORN is optogenetically activated, repulsion or attraction behavior can be induced, indicating which sensory neurons underlie which type of behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 91 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 27%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 56%
Neuroscience 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,607
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,803
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#50
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.