↓ Skip to main content

Decoding Continuous Variables from Neuroimaging Data: Basic and Clinical Applications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decoding Continuous Variables from Neuroimaging Data: Basic and Clinical Applications
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2011.00075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica R. Cohen, Robert F. Asarnow, Fred W. Sabb, Robert M. Bilder, Susan Y. Bookheimer, Barbara J. Knowlton, Russell A. Poldrack

Abstract

The application of statistical machine learning techniques to neuroimaging data has allowed researchers to decode the cognitive and disease states of participants. The majority of studies using these techniques have focused on pattern classification to decode the type of object a participant is viewing, the type of cognitive task a participant is completing, or the disease state of a participant's brain. However, an emerging body of literature is extending these classification studies to the decoding of values of continuous variables (such as age, cognitive characteristics, or neuropsychological state) using high-dimensional regression methods. This review details the methods used in such analyses and describes recent results. We provide specific examples of studies which have used this approach to answer novel questions about age and cognitive and disease states. We conclude that while there is still much to learn about these methods, they provide useful information about the relationship between neural activity and age, cognitive state, and disease state, which could not have been obtained using traditional univariate analytical methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 6%
Germany 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 196 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 9%
Student > Master 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 31%
Neuroscience 33 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 13%
Computer Science 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 36 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,401
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,147
of 190,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#47
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.