You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges of Interpreting Frontal Neurons during Value-Based Decision-Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2011.00124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan D. Wallis, Erin L. Rich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 32% |
| Researcher | 23 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,702,409
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,181
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,728
of 190,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#19
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.