↓ Skip to main content

Learning to Select Actions with Spiking Neurons in the Basal Ganglia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning to Select Actions with Spiking Neurons in the Basal Ganglia
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2012.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terrence C. Stewart, Trevor Bekolay, Chris Eliasmith

Abstract

We expand our existing spiking neuron model of decision making in the cortex and basal ganglia to include local learning on the synaptic connections between the cortex and striatum, modulated by a dopaminergic reward signal. We then compare this model to animal data in the bandit task, which is used to test rodent learning in conditions involving forced choice under rewards. Our results indicate a good match in terms of both behavioral learning results and spike patterns in the ventral striatum. The model successfully generalizes to learning the utilities of multiple actions, and can learn to choose different actions in different states. The purpose of our model is to provide both high-level behavioral predictions and low-level spike timing predictions while respecting known neurophysiology and neuroanatomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 3%
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Germany 2 2%
Switzerland 2 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 114 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 27%
Student > Master 27 20%
Researcher 23 17%
Professor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 11 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 17%
Computer Science 23 17%
Neuroscience 21 16%
Engineering 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,793
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,438
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#65
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.