You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using Time-Varying Evidence to Test Models of Decision Dynamics: Bounded Diffusion vs. the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2012.00079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konstantinos Tsetsos, Juan Gao, James L. McClelland, Marius Usher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 28% |
| Researcher | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 61 | 37% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,168,397
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,436
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,558
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#36
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.