↓ Skip to main content

Decision Points: The Factors Influencing the Decision to Feed in the Medicinal Leech

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision Points: The Factors Influencing the Decision to Feed in the Medicinal Leech
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2012.00101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quentin Gaudry, William B. Kristan

Abstract

The decision to feed is a complex task that requires making several small independent choices. Am I hungry? Where do I look for food? Is there something better I'd rather be doing? When should I stop? With all of these questions, it is no wonder that decisions about feeding depend on several sensory modalities and that the influences of these sensory systems would be evident throughout the nervous system. The leech is uniquely well suited for studying these complicated questions due to its relatively simple nervous system, its exceptionally well-characterized behaviors and neural circuits, and the ease with which one can employ semi-intact preparations to study the link between physiology and decision-making. We will begin this review by discussing the cellular substrates that govern the decision to initiate and to terminate a bout of feeding. We will then discuss how feeding temporarily blocks competing behaviors from being expressed while the animal continues to feed. Then we will review what is currently known about how feeding affects long-term behavioral choices of the leech. Finally, we conclude with a short discussion of the advantages of the leech's decision-making circuit's design and how this design might be applicable to all decision circuits.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
United States 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 31 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 33%
Neuroscience 10 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Psychology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 11%