You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EEG Oscillations Reveal Neural Correlates of Evidence Accumulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2012.00106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. K. van Vugt, P. Simen, L. E. Nystrom, P. Holmes, J. D. Cohen |
| Abstract |
Recent studies have begun to elucidate the neural correlates of evidence accumulation in perceptual decision making, but few of them have used a combined modeling-electrophysiological approach to studying evidence accumulation. We introduce a multivariate approach to EEG analysis with which we can perform a comprehensive search for the neural correlate of dynamics predicted by accumulator models. We show that the dynamics of evidence accumulation are most strongly correlated with ramping of oscillatory power in the 4-9 Hz theta band over the course of a trial, although it also correlates with oscillatory power in other frequency bands. The rate of power decrease in the theta band correlates with individual differences in the parameters of drift diffusion models fitted to individuals' behavioral data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 31% |
| Researcher | 52 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 83 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 38 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 6% |
| Engineering | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,425
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,822
of 250,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#102
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.