You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The NKI-Rockland Sample: A Model for Accelerating the Pace of Discovery Science in Psychiatry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2012.00152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Brody Nooner, Stanley J. Colcombe, Russell H. Tobe, Maarten Mennes, Melissa M. Benedict, Alexis L. Moreno, Laura J. Panek, Shaquanna Brown, Stephen T. Zavitz, Qingyang Li, Sharad Sikka, David Gutman, Saroja Bangaru, Rochelle Tziona Schlachter, Stephanie M. Kamiel, Ayesha R. Anwar, Caitlin M. Hinz, Michelle S. Kaplan, Anna B. Rachlin, Samantha Adelsberg, Brian Cheung, Ranjit Khanuja, Chaogan Yan, Cameron C. Craddock, Vincent Calhoun, William Courtney, Margaret King, Dylan Wood, Christine L. Cox, A. M. Clare Kelly, Adriana Di Martino, Eva Petkova, Philip T. Reiss, Nancy Duan, Dawn Thomsen, Bharat Biswal, Barbara Coffey, Matthew J. Hoptman, Daniel C. Javitt, Nunzio Pomara, John J. Sidtis, Harold S. Koplewicz, Francisco Xavier Castellanos, Bennett L. Leventhal, Michael P. Milham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 359 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 20% |
| Researcher | 69 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 20% |
| Unknown | 76 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 67 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 67 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 7% |
| Engineering | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 14% |
| Unknown | 101 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,167,267
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,435
of 11,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,342
of 251,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#36
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.