↓ Skip to main content

101 Labeled Brain Images and a Consistent Human Cortical Labeling Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
677 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
101 Labeled Brain Images and a Consistent Human Cortical Labeling Protocol
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2012.00171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arno Klein, Jason Tourville

Abstract

We introduce the Mindboggle-101 dataset, the largest and most complete set of free, publicly accessible, manually labeled human brain images. To manually label the macroscopic anatomy in magnetic resonance images of 101 healthy participants, we created a new cortical labeling protocol that relies on robust anatomical landmarks and minimal manual edits after initialization with automated labels. The "Desikan-Killiany-Tourville" (DKT) protocol is intended to improve the ease, consistency, and accuracy of labeling human cortical areas. Given how difficult it is to label brains, the Mindboggle-101 dataset is intended to serve as brain atlases for use in labeling other brains, as a normative dataset to establish morphometric variation in a healthy population for comparison against clinical populations, and contribute to the development, training, testing, and evaluation of automated registration and labeling algorithms. To this end, we also introduce benchmarks for the evaluation of such algorithms by comparing our manual labels with labels automatically generated by probabilistic and multi-atlas registration-based approaches. All data and related software and updated information are available on the http://mindboggle.info/data website.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 677 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Cuba 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 646 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 159 23%
Researcher 129 19%
Student > Master 75 11%
Other 36 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 5%
Other 120 18%
Unknown 123 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 148 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 12%
Psychology 61 9%
Engineering 59 9%
Computer Science 55 8%
Other 96 14%
Unknown 178 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,540,070
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#731
of 11,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,982
of 251,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#12
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.