↓ Skip to main content

Social cognition in borderline personality disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social cognition in borderline personality disorder
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2012.00195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Roepke, Aline Vater, Sandra Preißler, Hauke R. Heekeren, Isabel Dziobek

Abstract

Many typical symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) occur within interpersonal contexts, suggesting that BPD is characterized by aberrant social cognition. While research consistently shows that BPD patients have biases in mental state attribution (e.g., evaluate others as malevolent), the research focusing on accuracy in inferring mental states (i.e., cognitive empathy) is less consistent. For complex and ecologically valid tasks in particular, emerging evidence suggests that individuals with BPD have impairments in the attribution of emotions, thoughts, and intentions of others (e.g., Preißler et al., 2010). A history of childhood trauma and co-morbid PTSD seem to be strong additional predictors for cognitive empathy deficits. Together with reduced emotional empathy and aberrant sending of social signals (e.g., expression of mixed and hard-to-read emotions), the deficits in mental state attribution might contribute to behavioral problems in BPD. Given the importance of social cognition on the part of both the sender and the recipient in maintaining interpersonal relationships and therapeutic alliance, these impairments deserve more attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 301 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 15%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 9%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 66 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 167 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 9%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 72 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,288,844
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,016
of 11,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,532
of 289,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#85
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.