↓ Skip to main content

Helping oxytocin deliver: considerations in the development of oxytocin-based therapeutics for brain disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Helping oxytocin deliver: considerations in the development of oxytocin-based therapeutics for brain disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. MacDonald, D. Feifel

Abstract

Concerns regarding a drought in psychopharmacology have risen from many quarters. From one perspective, the wellspring of bedrock medications for anxiety disorders, depression, and schizophrenia was serendipitously discovered over 30 year ago, the swell of pharmaceutical investment in drug discovery has receded, and the pipeline's flow of medications with unique mechanisms of action (i.e., glutamatergic agents, CRF antagonists) has slowed to a trickle. Might oxytocin (OT)-based therapeutics be an oasis? Though a large basic science literature and a slowly increasing number of studies in human diseases support this hope, the bulk of extant OT studies in humans are single-dose studies on normals, and do not directly relate to improvements in human brain-based diseases. Instead, these studies have left us with a field pregnant with therapeutic possibilities, but barren of definitive treatments. In this clinically oriented review, we discuss the extant OT literature with an eye toward helping OT deliver on its promise as a therapeutic agent. To this end, we identify 10 key questions that we believe future OT research should address. From this overview, several conclusions are clear: (1) the OT system represents an extremely promising target for novel CNS drug development; (2) there is a pressing need for rigorous, randomized controlled clinical trials targeting actual patients; and (3) in order to inform the design and execution of these vital trials, we need further translational studies addressing the questions posed in this review. Looking forward, we extend a cautious hope that the next decade of OT research will birth OT-targeted treatments that can truly deliver on this system's therapeutic potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 275 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 19%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 53 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 15%
Neuroscience 37 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 69 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10,135
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,406
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#208
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.