You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A role for autonomic cardiac control in the effects of oxytocin on social behavior and psychiatric illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2013.00048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel S. Quintana, Andrew H. Kemp, Gail A. Alvares, Adam J. Guastella |
| Abstract |
Cumulative evidence over the last decade indicates that intranasally administered oxytocin (OT) has a major impact on social behavior and cognition. In parallel, researchers have also highlighted the effects of OT on cardiovascular (CV) and autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation. Taken at face value, these two streams of research appear largely unrelated. However, another line of evidence highlights a key role for autonomic cardiac control in social behavior and cognition. In this review, we suggest that autonomic cardiac control may moderate the relationship between OT and social behavior. We also highlight the importance of autonomic cardiac control in psychiatric disorders of social dysfunction and suggest that heart rate variability (HRV)-an index of autonomic cardiac control-may play a key role in patient response in treatment trials of OT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,315,767
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#589
of 11,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,065
of 290,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#20
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.