↓ Skip to main content

Hippocampus-dependent learning influences hippocampal neurogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hippocampus-dependent learning influences hippocampal neurogenesis
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan R. Epp, Carmen Chow, Liisa A. M. Galea

Abstract

The structure of the mammalian hippocampus continues to be modified throughout life by continuous addition of neurons in the dentate gyrus. Although the existence of adult neurogenesis is now widely accepted the function that adult generated granule cells play is a topic of intense debate. Many studies have argued that adult generated neurons, due to unique physiological characteristics, play a unique role in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. However, it is not currently clear whether this is the case or what specific capability adult generated neurons may confer that developmentally generated neurons do not. These questions have been addressed in numerous ways, from examining the effects of increasing or decreasing neurogenesis to computational modeling. One particular area of research has examined the effects of hippocampus dependent learning on proliferation, survival, integration and activation of immature neurons in response to memory retrieval. Within this subfield there remains a range of data showing that hippocampus dependent learning may increase, decrease or alternatively may not alter these components of neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Determining how and when hippocampus-dependent learning alters adult neurogenesis will help to further clarify the role of adult generated neurons. There are many variables (such as age of immature neurons, species, strain, sex, stress, task difficulty, and type of learning) as well as numerous methodological differences (such as marker type, quantification techniques, apparatus size etc.) that could all be crucial for a clear understanding of the interaction between learning and neurogenesis. Here, we review these findings and discuss the different conditions under which hippocampus-dependent learning impacts adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 151 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 26%
Student > Bachelor 27 17%
Student > Master 18 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 36%
Neuroscience 32 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Psychology 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#3,414,946
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,700
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,119
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#60
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.