↓ Skip to main content

Prefrontal dopamine and behavioral flexibility: shifting from an “inverted-U” toward a family of functions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prefrontal dopamine and behavioral flexibility: shifting from an “inverted-U” toward a family of functions
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stan B. Floresco

Abstract

Studies on prefrontal cortex (PFC) dopamine (DA) function have revealed its essential role in mediating a variety of cognitive and executive functions. A general principle that has emerged (primarily from studies on working memory) is that PFC DA, acting on D1 receptors, regulates cognition in accordance to an "inverted-U" shaped function, so that too little or too much activity has detrimental effects on performance. However, contemporary studies have indicated that the receptor mechanisms through which mesocortical DA regulates different aspects of behavioral flexibility can vary considerably across different DA receptors and cognitive operations. This article will review psychopharmacological and neurochemical data comparing and contrasting the cognitive effects of antagonism and stimulation of different DA receptors in the medial PFC. Thus, set-shifting is dependent on a co-operative interaction between PFC D1 and D2 receptors, yet, supranormal stimulation of these receptors does not appear to have detrimental effects on this function. On the other hand, modification of cost/benefit decision biases in situations involving reward uncertainty is regulated in complex and sometimes opposing ways by PFC D1 vs. D2 receptors. When viewed collectively, these findings suggest that the "inverted-U" shaped dose-response curve underlying D1 receptor modulation of working memory is not a one-size-fits-all function. Rather, it appears that mesocortical DA exerts its effects via a family of functions, wherein reduced or excessive DA activity can have a variety of effects across different cognitive domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 369 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 27%
Researcher 76 20%
Student > Master 44 11%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 48 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 108 28%
Psychology 90 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 64 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#2,026,778
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,133
of 11,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,720
of 289,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#38
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.