You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Instrumentation bias in the use and evaluation of scientific software: recommendations for reproducible practices in the computational sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2013.00162 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas J. Tustison, Hans J. Johnson, Torsten Rohlfing, Arno Klein, Satrajit S. Ghosh, Luis Ibanez, Brian B. Avants |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 27% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,289,649
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,353
of 11,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,687
of 291,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#52
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.